AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
![]() However, it was subsequently determined that he violated Workers' Compensation Law § 114-a by falsely testifying at a hearing that he had not worked since the date of his injury when, as the employer and its workers' compensation carrier demonstrated via video surveillance, he had been working at a pizzeria/deli. Appeal from an amended decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed September 20, 2004, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant violated Workers' Compensation Law § 114-a and disqualified him from receiving wage replacement benefits.Ĭlaimant sustained a work-related back injury in 1993 and thereafter began receiving workers' compensation benefits. Workers' Compensation Board, Respondent.Ĭardona, P.J. In the Matter of the Claim of Brian Woods, Appellant, v New York State Thruway Authority et al., Respondents. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.Īs corrected through Wednesday, May 17, 2006 ![]() Matter of Woods v New York State Thruway Auth. ![]()
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |